?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Sentimental yet sardonic [userpic]

*blink*

March 9th, 2007 (05:19 pm)

Things I could quite happily have lived on without ever knowing (number 47 in an occasional series) :

The difference between a gang-bang and an orgy.
In a gang-bang, one sex must out-number the other by a margin of at least 5 to 1. Any less, it's an orgy. Don't ask me what happens when it's all one sex.

~ + ~

And on a totally unrelated note (I swear!), would there be anyone out there willing to beta a Torchwood fic for me, if I crack on and get it finished and final polish applied tonight? It's got to be posted Sunday... *looks hopeful/pleading*

Comments

Posted by: Spectacularly Adequate Empress (empressvesica)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 06:37 pm (UTC)

Oddly enough? I already knew that. :P

Posted by: Sentimental yet sardonic (booster17)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 08:46 pm (UTC)
Dawn - close-up

Oddly enough? Not surprised. :P

Posted by: Sharlene (mynuet)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 08:48 pm (UTC)
Ever Wondrous! by jennymalfoy

I didn't know the ratios, but I knew the difference in definition, and so can answer the question about what happens if it's all one gender. Which I'm sure you can, too, but for Booster's edification:

While by the strictest definition any gathering of multiple members of the same gender for sexual activity would be an orgy, it misses the crucial distinction, and so the same definitions would be used, only replacing "recipient" and "penetrator" for "female" and "male", respectively.


Yeah, academicspeak really can make anything sound boring, can't it?

Posted by: Spectacularly Adequate Empress (empressvesica)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 09:03 pm (UTC)

It really can.

Posted by: Sentimental yet sardonic (booster17)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 09:13 pm (UTC)
Dawn - split screen

Sounds like a challenge....

Posted by: Sentimental yet sardonic (booster17)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 09:12 pm (UTC)
Head-desky [lurker32]

......zzzz? Meh? Whazz up?

(And I am reliably informed that given the sheer amount of lesbian gangbang porn that does exist, that 'penetrator' and 'recipient' is indeed a good way to describe such activities. *whistles innocently and refuses to meet anyone's eyes*)

Posted by: Sharlene (mynuet)
Posted at: March 9th, 2007 09:35 pm (UTC)
There there by peaces_icons

There, there. I'm reliably informed that it's actually okay and even healthy to watch/read/write porn, as long as no children or animals are involved.

7 Read Comments